Nuclear bodies: the global Hibakusha
In: International affairs, Band 99, Heft 5, S. 2164-2166
ISSN: 1468-2346
12 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International affairs, Band 99, Heft 5, S. 2164-2166
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 99, Heft 1, S. 413-415
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: Arms control today, Band 49, Heft 1, S. 32-33
ISSN: 0196-125X
World Affairs Online
In: Arms control today, Band 46, Heft 8, S. 5
ISSN: 0196-125X
In: Arms control today, Band 46, Heft 10, S. 16
ISSN: 0196-125X
In: Arms control today, Band 46, Heft 10, S. 31
ISSN: 0196-125X
In: Arms control today, Band 46, Heft 10, S. 5
ISSN: 0196-125X
In: Arms control today, Band 46, Heft 10, S. 7
ISSN: 0196-125X
In: International review of the Red Cross: humanitarian debate, law, policy, action, Band 105, Heft 922, S. 252-277
ISSN: 1607-5889
AbstractThe establishment of victim assistance as a core element of humanitarian disarmament emerged from three treaties: the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty (MBT), the 2006 Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM). The MBT introduced the concept of victim assistance, and the CPRD created a framework of human rights that influenced its evolution. Drawing on its predecessors, the CCM made victim assistance a robust and rights-based legal obligation. This article analyses the negotiating history and content of the treaties to show how victim assistance evolved, particularly in the areas of inclusion and human rights. It examines the treaties' implementation, which reveals that while the CRPD set standards for victim assistance, the MBT and CCM's victim assistance programmes have benefitted persons with disabilities in practice. Finally, it offers lessons from the MBT, CRPD and CCM for implementation and interpretation of victim assistance obligations under the 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The article concludes that the three treaties have collectively established assisting victims as a feature of disarmament law, helped persons with disabilities realize their rights, and laid the groundwork for adapting victim assistance to new challenges.
In: Journal for peace and nuclear disarmament, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 94-99
ISSN: 2575-1654
In: Arms control today, Band 47, Heft 10, S. 18-20
ISSN: 0196-125X
World Affairs Online
In: Global policy: gp, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 100-105
ISSN: 1758-5899
AbstractThe 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) not only bans nuclear weapons, it obligates its states parties to engage in assisting victims and remediating contaminated environments (Articles 6 and 7). As states and civil society consider the best methods to implement these provisions, it is important to take stock and review existing policy approaches addressing the ongoing humanitarian and environmental consequences of nuclear weapons. This practitioner commentary, written by members of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), which was awarded the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize for its advocacy for the TPNW, reviews existing programs of victim assistance and environmental remediation. It highlights key considerations for policy makers seeking to improve on the existing mechanisms.