Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Half Title -- Series Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Table of Contents -- Acknowledgements -- List of Abbreviations -- Introduction -- Eastern Europe: Memory of an Empire and Ecological Rebels? -- The Big Beast of Ideology -- Incomplete Ethnography for an Incomplete Ideology: The Method -- Overview of the Chapters -- 1 Far-Right Ecologist: Introducing the Spectrum -- Ecofascism: The Nazi Environmentalists and Misanthropic Neo-Malthusians -- Conservatism and Ecology: Local Identities as Historical Loyalties? -- Nationalism and Populism: Enhancing the Perimeter -- Conclusion -- 2 Far Right in Hungary and Poland -- Historical Commonalities as Points of Departure -- Far Right in Hungary: Living With Trianon -- Far Right in Poland: Narodowcy i nacjonaliści -- Conclusion -- 3 Greening the Core: The Central Concepts of FRE -- Who "We" are Not: The Threefold Axis of Meta-Enemies -- The Concrete Opponents: Communists, International Organisations and Greens -- Who "We" are: The (Reasonable) People Respectful of their Traditions -- Naturalism -- Organicism -- Conclusion -- 4 The Perimeter: Nostalgia, Autarky, Spirituality and Authority -- Nostalgia -- Autarky -- Spirituality -- Authority: "The Green Royalism" or Away From Eco-Dictatorship? -- Conclusion -- 5 FRE in Action: Policy and Activism -- Climate Change Acceptance: This (May) Change Everything -- Energy and Pollution -- Administrative Matters, Pollution, Biodiversity and Forestry -- Animal Welfare and Decision-Making -- Conclusion -- Conclusion -- The (Problematic) Potential of FRE -- On Method, Research and Limits -- What the Future (Research) Holds For FRE -- Appendix 1 - Overview of Interviews -- Index.

AbstractIn their attempts to associate the nationalistic ideology with speculative promises to emancipate the people from malevolent 'outsiders', right‐wing populists often engage with rural and agricultural topics. Meanwhile, green parties, commonly associated with the progressive ideas of environmentally friendly agriculture, occasionally employ the binary logic of agrarian populism. This paper has three objectives. First, to identify the discursive features of rural (right‐wing and agrarian) populism. Second, to examine how these discursive differences unfold in agricultural, party politics. Third, to examine the implications of overlapping ideas of populist and green parties for emancipatory rural politics. The study is predominantly based on the analysis of political discourses in Hungary: Jobbik (right‐wing populist) and LMP (green party), while the agricultural discourse of Fidesz, the ruling right‐wing populist party will serve as the background to the analysis. Particular attention is given to the aesthetic, symbolic, and material dimensions of land in discourse, including environmentally friendly farming and the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).