Suchergebnisse

Simple Summary: This review analyses the complex involvement of the various components of the endocannabinoid system (ECS) in the susceptibility to cancer, prognosis, and response to treatment, focusing on its relationship with cancer biology in selected solid cancers (breast, gastrointestinal, gynaecological, prostate cancer, thoracic, thyroid, central nervous system (CNS) tumours, and melanoma). The same ECS component can exert both protective and pathogenic effects in different tumour subtypes, which are often pathologically driven by different biological factors. Although an attractive target in cancer, the use of components in anti-cancer treatment is still interlinked with many legal and ethical issues that need to be considered. The legislation which outlines the permissive boundaries of their therapeutic use in oncology is still unable to follow the current scientific burden of evidence, but the number of ongoing clinical trials might tip the scale forward in the near future. ; This work was supported by the "Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad" and European Regional Development Funds of the European Union (Grant No. SAF2017-87629-R) and the Ministry of Education,Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (451-03-68/2020-14/200043).

The endocannabinoid system (ECS) has been placed in the anti-cancer spotlight in the last decade. The immense data load published on its dual role in both tumorigenesis and inhibition of tumor growth and metastatic spread has transformed the cannabinoid receptors CB1 (CB1R) and CB2 (CB2R), and other members of the endocannabinoid-like system, into attractive new targets for the treatment of various cancer subtypes. Although the clinical use of cannabinoids has been extensively documented in the palliative setting, clinical trials on their application as anti-cancer drugs are still ongoing. As drug repurposing is significantly faster and more economical than de novo introduction of a new drug into the clinic, there is hope that the existing pharmacokinetic and safety data on the ECS ligands will contribute to their successful translation into oncological healthcare. CB1R and CB2R are members of a large family of membrane proteins called G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). GPCRs can form homodimers, heterodimers and higher order oligomers with other GPCRs or non-GPCRs. Currently, several CB1R and CB2R-containing heteromers have been reported and, in cancer cells, CB2R form heteromers with the G protein-coupled chemokine receptor CXCR4, the G protein-coupled receptor 55 (GPR55) and the tyrosine kinase receptor (TKR) human V-Erb-B2 Avian Erythroblastic Leukemia Viral Oncogene Homolog 2 (HER2). These protein complexes possess unique pharmacological and signaling properties, and their modulation might affect the antitumoral activity of the ECS. This review will explore the potential of the endocannabinoid network in the anti-cancer setting as well as the clinical and ethical pitfalls behind it, and will develop on the value of cannabinoid receptor heteromers as potential new targets for anti-cancer therapies and as prognostic biomarkers. ; Funding: This work was supported by "Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad" and European Regional Development Funds of the European Union (Grant No. SAF2017-87629-R)

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by aggressive phenotype and a poorer prognosis compared to the estrogen and progesterone receptor positive, Her2 negative (ER + PR + Her2-) breast cancer. Increasing evidence suggests that sirtuins, a family of histone deacetylases, could have an important role in aggressiveness of TNBC's. The current study evaluated the potential clinical relevance of SIRT1, SIRT3 and SIRT6 gene expressions in two prognostically distinctive subtypes of breast cancer, the most aggressive TNBC and the least aggressive ER + PR + Her2- tumors. Total RNAs were isolated from 48 TNBC and 63 ER + PR + Her2- tumor samples. Relative gene expression was determined by SYBR Green RT-PCR and delta-delta Ct method, normalized to GAPDH. Mean gene expression of both SIRT1 and SIRT3 was significantly lower in the TNBC compared to ER + PR + Her2- tumors (p = 0.0001). Low SIRT1 and SIRT6 expressions associated with worse overall survival in ER + PR + Her2- patients (p = 0.039, p = 0.006, respectively), while TNBC patients with high SIRT1 tend to have a poor prognosis (p = 0.057). In contrast, high expression of SIRT3 in TNBC patients associated with higher histological grade (p = 0.027) and worse overall survival (p = 0.039). The Cox regression analysis revealed that low SIRT1 expression could be an independent prognostic marker of poor survival in ER + PR + Her2- breast cancers (HR = 11.765, 95% CI:1.234-100, p = 0.033). Observed differential expression of SIRT1, SIRT3 and SIRT6 genes in TNBC and ER + PR + Her2- subtypes, with opposite effects on patients' survival, suggests context-dependent mechanisms underlying aggressiveness of breast cancer. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate sirtuins as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in breast cancer. ; Funding Information This study was funded by Medical Faculty of Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, Serbia [grant MFVMA/02/20–22], and Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of ...