TY  - JOUR
TI  - Violating the Convention: M. Ja. Sjuzjumov's Participation in the Preparation of the History of Byzantium
AU  - Institute of World History of the RAS, Moscow
AU  - Kushch, Tatiana V.
AU  - Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg
PY  - 2022
PB  - Ural Federal University
AB  - This article examines the history behind the writing of the three-volume History of Byzantium (1967). In the 1950s and 1960s, the writing of "meta-narratives" meant covering the history of different states from the standpoint of the Marxist interpretation of the historical process and using the methods of historical materialism. In addition, collective work on them demonstrated the scholarly convention of Marxist historians. These principles were also implemented during the preparation of the History of Byzantium. A member of the editorial board and one of the main authors of the multi-volume work was Mikhail Jakovlevich Sjuzjumov (1893–1982), a Sverdlovsk scholar. Some letters kept in the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the State Archive of Sverdlovsk Region reflect his participation in the preparation of the History of Byzantium, the difficulties his texts underwent during the publication process, and his assessment of the results of the collective work. The article considers the scholar's concept which he adhered to when writing the chapters, analyses critical remarks about his texts, and emphasises the discrepancy between his interpretations and the assessment of the history of Byzantium established in Russian historiography. The chapters prepared by Sjuzjumov and devoted to sources on early Byzantine history, the history of the church, and the historical role of Byzantium were criticised especially harshly. Sjuzjumov's assessment of the Byzantine opposition and denial of the progressiveness of their views, his interpretation of Byzantine feudalism and the place of the Empire in world history contradicted the spirit and concept of the collective work. As a result, his two chapters were not included in the final version of the History of Byzantium. To achieve an academic convention, it was necessary to sacrifice the original interpretations proposed by the Sverdlovsk scholar. Nevertheless, Mikhail Sjuzjumov highly appreciated the publication of the History of Byzantium, although he noted its obvious shortcomings and weak points.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.15826/izv2.2022.24.2.031
DO  - 10.15826/izv2.2022.24.2.031
T2  - Izvestija Ural'skogo federalʹnogo universiteta: Ural Federal University journal. Serija 2, Gumanitarnye nauki = *Series 2*Humanities and arts
VL  - 24
IS  - 2
SN  - 2587-6929
SN  - 2227-2283
SP  - 155-166
UR  - https://www.pollux-fid.de/r/cr-10.15826/izv2.2022.24.2.031
H1  - Pollux (Fachinformationsdienst Politikwissenschaft)
ER  -