TY  - GEN
TI  - What's in a good argument about evaluative claims? Argumentation in accountability practices
AU  - Mohammed, Dima
PY  - 2016
PB  - Scholarship at UWindsor
KW  - accountability
KW  - argument from sign
KW  - conductive argument
KW  - evaluative claim
KW  - evaluative adjectives
KW  - fact-value distinction
KW  - symptomatic argument
KW  - type of standpoint
KW  - Arts and Humanities
KW  - Philosophy
AB  - What counts as a good defence of the conduct of a political agent? I formulate an answer combining insights from argumentation scholarship on the different types of standpoints and the schemes suitable to defend them with insights from philosophical literature (fact vs. value, theoretical vs. practical reasoning … etc). The goal is to make a proposal that is best suitable for examining the type of evaluative claims that is typically discussed in accountability practices.
UR  - https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA11/papersandcommentaries/116
UR  - https://www.pollux-fid.de/r/base-ftunivwindsor:oai:scholar.uwindsor.ca:ossaarchive-2283
H1  - Pollux (Fachinformationsdienst Politikwissenschaft)
ER  -