Search results

This research paper examines the relationship between the type of transition and electoral system choice.The analysis is based upon a country sample of 51 third-wave democracies. The theoretical argumentslead to the hypothesis that countries whose transitions to democracy are driven both by the ruling elitesand civic forces apply more permissive electoral systems afterwards. Whenever there is one dominantactor during the transition process, a less permissive electoral system becomes more likely. It is alsoassumed that countries that have a democratic past tend to rely on the institutional design of that period.The results of a multiple regression analysis confirm the hypotheses and point out that political actorsbehave strategically and according to their utility function, especially in transition processes, which arecharacterized by great uncertainty. Ideology does not matter and information from the past is used topredict future developments.

This research paper examines the relationship between the type of transition and electoral system choice. The analysis is based upon a country sample of 51 third-wave democracies. The theoretical arguments lead to the hypothesis that countries whose transitions to democracy are driven both by the ruling elites and civic forces apply more permissive electoral systems afterwards. Whenever there is one dominant actor during the transition process, a less permissive electoral system becomes more likely. It is also assumed that countries that have a democratic past tend to rely on the institutional design of that period. The results of a multiple regression analysis confirm the hypotheses and point out that political actors behave strategically and according to their utility function, especially in transition processes, which are characterized by great uncertainty. Ideology does not matter and information from the past is used to predict future developments. Adapted from the source document.