Search results

The article analyzes the concept of "counteraction to budget legislation violations" and identifies the subjects of such counteraction. It is noted that counteraction to violations of budget legislation involves the activities of authorized entities to formulate public policy in this area (with the definition of coordination mechanism), prevention (detection and neutralization of causes and conditions), detection and termination of budget torts, liability and elimination of negative consequences from their commission. It is proposed to consider the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, the President of Ukraine, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, budget control bodies (Accounting Chamber, Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, local financial bodies, bodies of the State Treasury Service of Ukraine, bodies of the State Audit Service of Ukraine), law enforcement bodies(National Police, National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, State Bureau of Investigation, Security Service of Ukraine, Tax Police, Prosecutor's Office) and courts as subjects of counteraction to budget legislation violations. The legislative, control and constituent functions of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine as a subject of counteraction to budget legislation violations have been revealed. It is noted that the President of Ukraine and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine are entities that determine strategic and tactical measures to combat budget violations on the basis of laws adopted by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and make efforts to coordinate the activities of direct executors of these measures. Examples of prompt response to problems of proper budget funds use by the Government of Ukraine and its implementation of the constituent function by creating and reorganizing certain entities to combat violations of budget legislation are given. It is noted that the courts as subjects of counteraction to budget legislation violations exercise their powers through the administration of justice in criminal proceedings under Art. 210 "Improper use of budget funds, ...

Коррупция – глобальная проблема современности, которая в разной степени существует во всех странах мира и представляет большой исследовательский интерес в качестве объекта. Данное негативное явление влияет на все сферы жизнедеятельности общества. Предметом нашего исследования является антикоррупционная политика в КНР. Комплекс антикоррупционных мер рассматривается в различные исторические периоды развития Китая, что позволяет определить основные принципы борьбы и конкретные организационные и профилактические мероприятия и механизмы противодействия явлению коррупции.

The article describes the experience of Latvia in programming the counteraction of crime in modern conditions. It is established that Latvia among the countries of the European Union in most can be attributed to a country with a stable criminogenic situation. However, recently the share of especially grave crimes (homicide in particular) and juvenile delinquency is increasing, influences the formation of state policy in the sphere of counteraction crime. It was found that there is no unified comprehensive state crime prevention program. However, there are other strategic and program documents defining a modern crime prevention policy in Latvia, namely: the Strategy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Latvia for 2017-2019 and the Concept of the International Police Cooperation and Fight against Crime program for 2014-2021. These two documents are interrelated and complement each other, as well as based on other government strategies for the country's socio-economic development. The Strategy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Latvia for 2017-2019 determines the relevant priorities and activities in the sphere of counteraction crime that are necessary for the implementation of the police as a whole and the public security police. The concept of the "International police cooperation and fight against crime" program for 2014–2021, by its content, is mostly aimed at counteracting economic crimes, corruption, as well as domestic and gender-based violence. A distinctive feature of the Concept of the "International Police Cooperation and the Fight against Crime" program for 2014–2021 is that this program document represents a certain symbiosis of individual elements of strategic documents: Concept - Program - Plan - Basic Software Projects. It also clearly establishes a differentiated approach to determining the relationship between "soft" and "hard" measures, which are used in two program areas PJ20 (International police cooperation and the fight against crime) and PJ22 (Domestic and Gender Violence). The ...

Objectification theory: an introduction / Rachel M. Calogero, Stacey Tantleff-Dunn, and J. Kevin Thompson -- Operationalizing self-objectification: assessment and related methodological issues / Rachel M. Calogero -- The sexualization of girls and women as a primary antecedent of self-objectification / Linda Smolak and Sarah K. Murnen -- The birthmark: an existential account of the objectification of women / Jamie L. Goldenberg and Tomi-Ann Roberts -- Continuity and change in self-objectification: taking a life-span approach to women's experiences of objectified body consciousness / Nita Mary McKinley -- Performance and flow: a review and integration of self-objectification research / Diane M. Quinn, Stephenie R. Chaudoir, and Rachel W. Kallen -- Mental health risks of self-objectification: a review of the empirical evidence for disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual dysfunction / Marika Tiggemann -- Embodying experiences and the promotion of positive body image: the example of competitive athletics / Jessie E. Menzel and Michael P. Levine -- Fighting self-objectification in prevention and intervention contexts / Tracy L. Tylka and Casey L. Augustus-Horvath -- Future directions for research and practice / Rachel M. Calogero, Stacey Tantleff-Dunn, and J. Kevin Thompson