Analysis of R&D portfolio strategies for contract competition
In: IEEE transactions on engineering management: EM ; a publication of the IEEE Engineering Management Society, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 181-186
2277 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: IEEE transactions on engineering management: EM ; a publication of the IEEE Engineering Management Society, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 181-186
In: Journal of economics, Band 118, Heft 3, S. 193-218
ISSN: 1617-7134
In: Socio-economic planning sciences: the international journal of public sector decision-making, Band 20, Heft 6, S. 407-415
ISSN: 0038-0121
In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP12267
SSRN
Working paper
In: Public performance & management review, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 186-213
ISSN: 1530-9576
In: American economic review, Band 91, Heft 5, S. 1311-1328
ISSN: 1944-7981
We present a model of an unsecured loan market. Many lenders simultaneously offer loan contracts (a debt level and an interest rate) to a borrower. The borrower may accept more than one contract. Her payoff if she defaults increases in the total amount borrowed. If this payoff is high enough, deterministic zero-profit equilibria cannot be sustained. Lenders earn a positive profit, and may even charge the monopoly price. The positive-profit equilibria are robust to increases in the number of lenders. Despite the absence of asymmetric information, the competitive outcome does not obtain in the limit. (JEL D43, L13, L14)
In: Oxford review of economic policy, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 1-121
ISSN: 0266-903X
World Affairs Online
In: The Rand journal of economics, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 296
ISSN: 1756-2171
In: Forthcoming in Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
SSRN
Working paper
In: Oxford review of economic policy, Band 12, S. 1-10
ISSN: 0266-903X
SSRN
In: Tuck School of Business Working Paper No. 3802342
SSRN
In: In D Leczykiewicz and S Weatherill (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Studies of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2013)
SSRN
In: Oxford review of economic policy, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 1-10
ISSN: 1460-2121
One of the principal objectives of Congress in enacting laws to govern federal government contract awards is to insure competition by maximizing the number of contractors who compete for these contracts. To insure full and open competition, the specifications in government contracts must permit all responsible sources of goods, services, and construction to compete for the work. Specifications which are drawn so that only one source or a very limited number of sources can compete for the work may effectively thwart competition. Whether and how to enforce this requirement for competitive specifications during contract performance is this article's subject.
BASE